Who should set the total allowable catch? Social preferences and legitimacy in fisheries management institutions
EfD Authors:
This article presents a decision-making model based on situations that are typically encountered in fisheries management when setting the total allowable quota. The model allows assessing the differences in outcomes when different management institutions make the decision under uncertain conditions. Social preferences are considered to measure the social expected costs raised by different institutions.
IDRC, Canada
![](/sites/default/files/styles/teaser_330x220/public/dsc00161.jpg?itok=ro9uc2ON)
NENRE renewed support from the Chilean Government
Membership of a well-reputed international environmental economics research and capacity building network such as the EfD initiative was among the criteria when the Chilean EfD Center, the Research…
Pagination
- Previous page
- Page 13
- Next page